<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 21ST CENTURY ROCKSTARDOM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/</link>
	<description>An Indie Musician&#039;s Guide to World Domination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:34:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: atv tires</title>
		<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>atv tires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/?p=4#comment-734</guid>
		<description>Great blog! much appreciated.

Sent from my iPhone 4G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog! much appreciated.</p>
<p>Sent from my iPhone 4G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fi c</title>
		<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>fi c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/?p=4#comment-692</guid>
		<description>i agree with a lot of  the content of this well written piece - i also think that paid music sites eg emusic encourage their users to search out new bands
it is also possible to recreate the cd version if one wants it by bundling jpegs of the cd book etc with the music so lack of tangible product will not prove a long term barrier
this is at least in part because the nature of music production has changed vastly over the last 15 years - digital production has gone from tens of thousands of pounds worth of investment to a back room operation possible on a pc or mac (at a quality a far cry from the old portastudio days!)
this is great as it means it is possible for artists to lower their production costs which used to be a part of the record contract - also the massive popularity of live music has made touring and playing live affordable again - it also allows artists much more control of their sound and direction as the record company has no say on the music produced
this however only really applies to the music industry model and although i am easily bored by tv ads the truth is that a lot of them cost as much to make as the programme you are watching.  both ads and tv programmes keep production/film companies in business and without the ads who would be making csi or documentaries or progammes about anything that didnt give some kind of financial return? few tv companies are like the uk&#039;s bbc which is publically funded and obliged by charter to make progammes for all markets - most tv progammes are sold to the tv companies which pay for them with advertising generated money. TIVO was delayed until the ability to remove ads was removed and if the advertisers stop making ads the whole  tv industry could collapse
free tv on the internet still depends on people commisioning,funding and making programmes in the first place so at least pretend to care about the ads or there will be no more decent tv ! i for one do not want to watch an evening of you tube home videos instead of csi etc so i hope the tv industry finds a way round this 
i have worked in audio post production in both music and tv industries and both suck but as an end user i have to point out that quality music is a lot cheaper to produce and sell than quality tv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with a lot of  the content of this well written piece &#8211; i also think that paid music sites eg emusic encourage their users to search out new bands<br />
it is also possible to recreate the cd version if one wants it by bundling jpegs of the cd book etc with the music so lack of tangible product will not prove a long term barrier<br />
this is at least in part because the nature of music production has changed vastly over the last 15 years &#8211; digital production has gone from tens of thousands of pounds worth of investment to a back room operation possible on a pc or mac (at a quality a far cry from the old portastudio days!)<br />
this is great as it means it is possible for artists to lower their production costs which used to be a part of the record contract &#8211; also the massive popularity of live music has made touring and playing live affordable again &#8211; it also allows artists much more control of their sound and direction as the record company has no say on the music produced<br />
this however only really applies to the music industry model and although i am easily bored by tv ads the truth is that a lot of them cost as much to make as the programme you are watching.  both ads and tv programmes keep production/film companies in business and without the ads who would be making csi or documentaries or progammes about anything that didnt give some kind of financial return? few tv companies are like the uk&#8217;s bbc which is publically funded and obliged by charter to make progammes for all markets &#8211; most tv progammes are sold to the tv companies which pay for them with advertising generated money. TIVO was delayed until the ability to remove ads was removed and if the advertisers stop making ads the whole  tv industry could collapse<br />
free tv on the internet still depends on people commisioning,funding and making programmes in the first place so at least pretend to care about the ads or there will be no more decent tv ! i for one do not want to watch an evening of you tube home videos instead of csi etc so i hope the tv industry finds a way round this<br />
i have worked in audio post production in both music and tv industries and both suck but as an end user i have to point out that quality music is a lot cheaper to produce and sell than quality tv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 23:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/?p=4#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Thanks Daniel,

There are dozens and dozens of examples out there of fans and artists interacting in a much more personal way than they ever could (or would) have before the internet. Like THIS, for example.

I&#039;m sure a lot of people use MySpace for things other than discovering music, but the fact remains that MySpace is one of the best places to find new artists, if you so desire. I know quite a few bands who put more effort and energy into their MySpace pages than their official websites; some bands&#039; &quot;official&quot; sites are just redirect pages to their social network profiles! MySpace seems to understand the strength of their system as they&#039;re currently pouring money and time into their MySpace Music system, in the hopes that they really will be able to lock down the #1 spot in the race to become the new portal for fans to discover artists (they made quite a statement in their acquisition of the iLike platform - sticking it to Facebook in the process). 

I may be a little &quot;doom and gloom&quot; when it comes to physical media, but I think the transition to all-digital is inevitable. If the recording industry was really fighting to sustain physical forms of music media, don&#039;t you think we&#039;d have heard about a Blu-Ray equivalent for recorded music by now? Some sort of high-def music platform? The technology exists, and there&#039;s no reason not to release super hi-def versions of albums on DVDs or something - unless everyone sees the writing on the wall. Trying to push the public to a new hardware platform would be DEVASTATING at this point, since most people who aren&#039;t downloading music now might be swayed by the idea of needing a new and expensive device to get their favorite band&#039;s new hi-def album...

I do hear from a lot of people (my drummer, for example) that they&#039;ll never switch over to digital albums because they love the tangibility of a physical CD and all the benefits therein. It&#039;s a funny thing though - we&#039;ve got pretty short memories. By far, the biggest period in the history of recorded music sales was the 80&#039;s - the heyday of the stadium rock tours - and most of those millions and millions of albums were sold as cassette tapes. Don&#039;t try to tell me that people bought cassette tapes for the artwork - they were paying for the music, and if the transition to digital had been straight from cassettes instead of CDs, I think you&#039;d see a lot less opposition. 

The truth is, artists can bundle a TON more content with digital releases than they ever could with any physical product, because digital media (once it&#039;s created) has ZERO overhead. If I can release an album online, and include in the digital bundle 10 tour videos, a making-of short, alternate mixes and a hundred photographs, who could honestly say they&#039;d rather have some tiny-print lyrics and a few thank-you&#039;s to random industry people?

To people who say that physical albums will never go away, or be overtaken by digital sales (although that happened over a year ago) I like to point out that this Christmas, for the first time ever, Amazon.com sold more E-Books than real ones. If people are willing to go digital for their BOOKS, CD booklets don&#039;t stand a chance in hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Daniel,</p>
<p>There are dozens and dozens of examples out there of fans and artists interacting in a much more personal way than they ever could (or would) have before the internet. Like THIS, for example.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure a lot of people use MySpace for things other than discovering music, but the fact remains that MySpace is one of the best places to find new artists, if you so desire. I know quite a few bands who put more effort and energy into their MySpace pages than their official websites; some bands&#8217; &#8220;official&#8221; sites are just redirect pages to their social network profiles! MySpace seems to understand the strength of their system as they&#8217;re currently pouring money and time into their MySpace Music system, in the hopes that they really will be able to lock down the #1 spot in the race to become the new portal for fans to discover artists (they made quite a statement in their acquisition of the iLike platform &#8211; sticking it to Facebook in the process). </p>
<p>I may be a little &#8220;doom and gloom&#8221; when it comes to physical media, but I think the transition to all-digital is inevitable. If the recording industry was really fighting to sustain physical forms of music media, don&#8217;t you think we&#8217;d have heard about a Blu-Ray equivalent for recorded music by now? Some sort of high-def music platform? The technology exists, and there&#8217;s no reason not to release super hi-def versions of albums on DVDs or something &#8211; unless everyone sees the writing on the wall. Trying to push the public to a new hardware platform would be DEVASTATING at this point, since most people who aren&#8217;t downloading music now might be swayed by the idea of needing a new and expensive device to get their favorite band&#8217;s new hi-def album&#8230;</p>
<p>I do hear from a lot of people (my drummer, for example) that they&#8217;ll never switch over to digital albums because they love the tangibility of a physical CD and all the benefits therein. It&#8217;s a funny thing though &#8211; we&#8217;ve got pretty short memories. By far, the biggest period in the history of recorded music sales was the 80&#8242;s &#8211; the heyday of the stadium rock tours &#8211; and most of those millions and millions of albums were sold as cassette tapes. Don&#8217;t try to tell me that people bought cassette tapes for the artwork &#8211; they were paying for the music, and if the transition to digital had been straight from cassettes instead of CDs, I think you&#8217;d see a lot less opposition. </p>
<p>The truth is, artists can bundle a TON more content with digital releases than they ever could with any physical product, because digital media (once it&#8217;s created) has ZERO overhead. If I can release an album online, and include in the digital bundle 10 tour videos, a making-of short, alternate mixes and a hundred photographs, who could honestly say they&#8217;d rather have some tiny-print lyrics and a few thank-you&#8217;s to random industry people?</p>
<p>To people who say that physical albums will never go away, or be overtaken by digital sales (although that happened over a year ago) I like to point out that this Christmas, for the first time ever, Amazon.com sold more E-Books than real ones. If people are willing to go digital for their BOOKS, CD booklets don&#8217;t stand a chance in hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alissa</title>
		<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Alissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 20:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/?p=4#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Brian, 

Insightful piece. Not only are music sales and television going digital, but more and more folks are listening to radio that way, too. The explosion of people using Pandora and Last.fm speak to that. Last.fm is where I discovered ETH, through Seven Nations radio &quot;station&quot;! In a society fueled strongly by instant gratification, digital media provides the opportunity to stumble upon something you love and immediately add it to your music library with just a few clicks. 

And while I concur there is oodles of talent to be had on myspace, the sheer volume is daunting. Though I take pride is listening to quality musicians most, if not all, of my close friends haven&#039;t heard of previously. :)

Even though you&#039;re Canadian, I wondered if you had any thoughts on the United States Congress&#039; proposal to pass a bill that forces radio broadcasters to pay royalties to performers for the music played on the airwaves? 

Cheers,
Alissa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, </p>
<p>Insightful piece. Not only are music sales and television going digital, but more and more folks are listening to radio that way, too. The explosion of people using Pandora and Last.fm speak to that. Last.fm is where I discovered ETH, through Seven Nations radio &#8220;station&#8221;! In a society fueled strongly by instant gratification, digital media provides the opportunity to stumble upon something you love and immediately add it to your music library with just a few clicks. </p>
<p>And while I concur there is oodles of talent to be had on myspace, the sheer volume is daunting. Though I take pride is listening to quality musicians most, if not all, of my close friends haven&#8217;t heard of previously. <img src='http://www.brianbuchanan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Even though you&#8217;re Canadian, I wondered if you had any thoughts on the United States Congress&#8217; proposal to pass a bill that forces radio broadcasters to pay royalties to performers for the music played on the airwaves? </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Alissa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/?p=4#comment-241</guid>
		<description>It’s an interesting phenomenon that I think a lot of industries are going through. You’re right- the television and movie industries aren’t ready for their (perhaps timely) deaths; instead they’re doing their best to postpone the inevitable. Print media has already all but become extinct, and even the world of sports is experiencing a dilemma as fewer companies are willing to pay exorbitant prices to sponsor expensive events. It seems that no one quite knows what to do with savvier and thriftier consumers, and it will be interesting to see what tactics come from it all and which approach perseveres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s an interesting phenomenon that I think a lot of industries are going through. You’re right- the television and movie industries aren’t ready for their (perhaps timely) deaths; instead they’re doing their best to postpone the inevitable. Print media has already all but become extinct, and even the world of sports is experiencing a dilemma as fewer companies are willing to pay exorbitant prices to sponsor expensive events. It seems that no one quite knows what to do with savvier and thriftier consumers, and it will be interesting to see what tactics come from it all and which approach perseveres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/?p=4#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Haha - good old Owen. Did you know he was actually my predecessor in ETH, and the guy who introduced me to the band?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha &#8211; good old Owen. Did you know he was actually my predecessor in ETH, and the guy who introduced me to the band?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel K</title>
		<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/?p=4#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Really?! I had no idea! That&#039;s amazing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?! I had no idea! That&#8217;s amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brianhaggis</title>
		<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>brianhaggis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/?p=4#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Haha - good old Owen. Did you know he was actually my predecessor in ETH, and the guy who introduced me to the band?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha &#8211; good old Owen. Did you know he was actually my predecessor in ETH, and the guy who introduced me to the band?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel K</title>
		<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/?p=4#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks for the great response, Brian!

Everything you say sounds very reasonable and logical. However, a part of me is still thinking &quot;But I like having a little CD booklet with lyrics to look at, when I first listen to the album...&quot; That&#039;s something I&#039;ve really been missing, as I&#039;ve started buying more albums online.

Sitting on a sofa, putting my computer on my lap to read online postings of lyrics while listening to the music (from the same computer?) is not a feasible option, nor are looking at any of the digital &quot;bonus materials&quot; bands are releasing... Though just as I was writing that, I realized something: you don&#039;t have to do that! With all the new smartphone technology (and &quot;smart&quot; wi-fi-enabled technology like iTouch) out there-- and the imminent launch of the iPad and the inevitable flood of copycat devices-- I&#039;ll be able to read the lyrics on my device (as well as check out &quot;bonus content&quot;), sitting comfortably on a sofa!

Well, I initially started replying to refute some of what you said, but I think I&#039;ve started to see the light. With that said, I also feel that the focus on physical packaging will still come to pass (for folks like me and James). But hey, if I get a nice enough &quot;smart device&quot; (I don&#039;t have one) and bands start releasing enough nice &quot;digital packages,&quot; then hey, I could change. Storage of physical media would cease to be a problem. Digital backups, however, would start to become even more of a concern...

One more thing: interesting point about how the music industry isn&#039;t pushing a new &quot;Hi-def&quot;-like technology on us, though you say &quot;We have the technology.&quot; That&#039;s a good thing... I&#039;m already riled up enough about Blu-Ray&#039;s introduction.

With the extreme popularity of portable MP3 players, I think industry types realize that selling a device to play &quot;hi-def music&quot; wouldn&#039;t go over too well.

I read an interview with Owen Pallett (the artist formerly known as Final Fantasy, (I liked that name...)), and he talked about how much he stressed over the production values of his latest albums. He was trying so hard and making such a big deal out of track layers, sound quality, and all that other technical stuff I don&#039;t know about. But, he realized that most people wouldn&#039;t appreciate all that work, as they&#039;ll listen to his music on MP3 devices or desktop computer speakers. He apparently made himself quite sick over those concerns...

Here&#039;s the interview: http://www.nowtoronto.com/music/story.cfm?content=173144</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks for the great response, Brian!</p>
<p>Everything you say sounds very reasonable and logical. However, a part of me is still thinking &#8220;But I like having a little CD booklet with lyrics to look at, when I first listen to the album&#8230;&#8221; That&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve really been missing, as I&#8217;ve started buying more albums online.</p>
<p>Sitting on a sofa, putting my computer on my lap to read online postings of lyrics while listening to the music (from the same computer?) is not a feasible option, nor are looking at any of the digital &#8220;bonus materials&#8221; bands are releasing&#8230; Though just as I was writing that, I realized something: you don&#8217;t have to do that! With all the new smartphone technology (and &#8220;smart&#8221; wi-fi-enabled technology like iTouch) out there&#8211; and the imminent launch of the iPad and the inevitable flood of copycat devices&#8211; I&#8217;ll be able to read the lyrics on my device (as well as check out &#8220;bonus content&#8221;), sitting comfortably on a sofa!</p>
<p>Well, I initially started replying to refute some of what you said, but I think I&#8217;ve started to see the light. With that said, I also feel that the focus on physical packaging will still come to pass (for folks like me and James). But hey, if I get a nice enough &#8220;smart device&#8221; (I don&#8217;t have one) and bands start releasing enough nice &#8220;digital packages,&#8221; then hey, I could change. Storage of physical media would cease to be a problem. Digital backups, however, would start to become even more of a concern&#8230;</p>
<p>One more thing: interesting point about how the music industry isn&#8217;t pushing a new &#8220;Hi-def&#8221;-like technology on us, though you say &#8220;We have the technology.&#8221; That&#8217;s a good thing&#8230; I&#8217;m already riled up enough about Blu-Ray&#8217;s introduction.</p>
<p>With the extreme popularity of portable MP3 players, I think industry types realize that selling a device to play &#8220;hi-def music&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t go over too well.</p>
<p>I read an interview with Owen Pallett (the artist formerly known as Final Fantasy, (I liked that name&#8230;)), and he talked about how much he stressed over the production values of his latest albums. He was trying so hard and making such a big deal out of track layers, sound quality, and all that other technical stuff I don&#8217;t know about. But, he realized that most people wouldn&#8217;t appreciate all that work, as they&#8217;ll listen to his music on MP3 devices or desktop computer speakers. He apparently made himself quite sick over those concerns&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the interview: <a href="http://www.nowtoronto.com/music/story.cfm?content=173144" rel="nofollow">http://www.nowtoronto.com/music/story.cfm?content=173144</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misc Monday – January 18th edition &#124; Nine Live Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Misc Monday – January 18th edition &#124; Nine Live Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/?p=4#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/" rel="nofollow">http://www.brianbuchanan.org/2010/01/10/21st-century-rockstardom/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

